CheckThatPhone vs Other Phone Validation APIs: What You Should Know
If youβve researched phone number validation APIs, youβve likely come across tools like Twilio Lookup, Numverify, Nexmo, and others. But how do they compare in real-world use?
This article breaks down the key differences between CheckThatPhone and other common validation APIs β so you can choose the best fit for your business.
π Feature Comparison: The Essentials
Feature
CheckThatPhone
Twilio Lookup
Numverify
Nexmo (Vonage)
Real-time carrier lookup
β Yes
β Yes
β No
β Yes
Line type detection
β Yes
β Yes
β Yes
β Yes
VoIP detection
β Advanced
β Limited
β No
β Limited
Deliverability guidance
β Action-based
β No
β No
β No
Deactivation check
β Yes
β No
β No
β No
GeoIP & timezone
β Yes
β No
β No
β No
Portability check
β Yes
β Yes
β No
β Yes
LRN (routing) support
β Yes
β Paid tier
β No
β Yes
API speed
β‘ Fast (<400ms)
β οΈ Slower
β Fast
β οΈ Variable
Pricing
π° Affordable
π° Higher
π’ Free tier, limited
π° Moderate
π§ Where CheckThatPhone Stands Out
1. Action-Based Recommendations
Instead of raw data alone, CheckThatPhone includes an action field with guidance like send, wait, or skip based on status and history. This saves you from building custom logic around deactivated or VoIP numbers.
2. Better Fraud Prevention
Advanced VoIP detection, deactivation insights, and carrier scoring make it easier to flag risky or disposable numbers β something basic validators miss.
3. Lightweight and Fast
CheckThatPhoneβs API is optimized for speed and minimal latency. That makes it ideal for real-time validation during signup or just-in-time SMS delivery.
4. Built for U.S. and Canada
While many tools offer global validation, CheckThatPhone focuses exclusively on U.S. and Canadian numbers β with deeper carrier insights and higher local accuracy.
5. Fair Pricing
You donβt pay for fluff or locked premium tiers. Pricing is simple, transparent, and available on RapidAPI with usage-based scaling.
π Where Other APIs Fall Short
Twilio Lookup offers good carrier data but lacks portability insights unless you pay for LRN β and provides no guidance for what to do with the result.
Numverify is often outdated, relies on static databases, and doesnβt detect porting or deactivation.
Nexmo has solid basics, but limited fraud protection, no GeoIP enrichment, and slower performance in some regions.
All three tools may return valid-looking numbers that are actually unreachable or low quality β unless you build your own filtering logic on top.
π§ͺ Use Case Match
Use Case
Best Fit
Real-time validation + routing
β CheckThatPhone
Lightweight signup filtering
β CheckThatPhone
Global phone support
π Other APIs
Static formatting only
π’ Numverify (free)
Deep fraud scoring
β CheckThatPhone
β Final Thoughts
Not all phone validation APIs are built for modern lead gen, user verification, or messaging platforms. If your goal is to:
Reduce failed SMS or calls
Catch risky or fake signups
Clean CRM data for U.S./CA numbers
Operate at scale, in real time
Save on messaging costs
Then CheckThatPhone is purpose-built to give you the insights others miss.